From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20083 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2009 16:29:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 20053 invoked by uid 48); 27 Apr 2009 16:29:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090427162937.20052.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug regression/39914] 96% performance regression in floating point code; part of the problem started 2009/03/12-13 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "lucier at math dot purdue dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02613.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-04-27 16:29 ------- I hadn't noticed before that Andrew had marked it as "RESOLVED INVALID". I'm reopening it, as I believe that resolving it as INVALID should require a more general discussion than a one-line dismissal of the bug. Brad -- lucier at math dot purdue dot edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39914