public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006
@ 2009-04-28 4:24 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 4:27 ` [Bug middle-end/39937] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-28 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
On Linux/Intel64, revision 146848 failed with -O2 -ffast-math:
Error: 1x416.gamess 1x435.gromacs
Revision 146820 is OK.
--
Summary: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-28 4:27 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 6:01 ` [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-28 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-28 04:27 -------
I got
gfortran -c -o dftint.fppized.o -O2 -ffast-math -DSPEC_CPU_LP64
-ffixed-form dftint.fppized.f
gfortran -c -o dgeev.o -O2 -ffast-math -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -ffixed-form
dgeev.f
dgeev.f: In function 'dtrevc':
dgeev.f:6294: error: type mismatch in binary expression
<unnamed-unsigned:64>
integer(kind=8)
integer(kind=8)
D.9709_2748 = D.9706_2745 - D.9708_2747;
dgeev.f:6294: error: type mismatch in binary expression
<unnamed-unsigned:64>
<unnamed-unsigned:64>
integer(kind=8)
D.9710_2749 = D.9709_2748 * stride.389_98;
dgeev.f:6294: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [dgeev.o] Error 1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 4:27 ` [Bug middle-end/39937] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-28 6:01 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-28 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-28 06:01 -------
Revision 146831:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-04/msg01473.html
is the cause.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenther at suse dot de
Summary|[4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC|[4.5 Regression] Revision
|CPU 2006 |146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 4:27 ` [Bug middle-end/39937] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 6:01 ` [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-28 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 12:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-28 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 11:55 -------
SUBROUTINE DTREVC( SIDE, HOWMNY, SELECT, N, T, LDT, VL, LDVL, VR,
$ LDVR, MM, M, WORK, INFO )
DOUBLE PRECISION T( LDT, * ), VL( LDVL, * ), VR( LDVR, * ),
$ WORK( * )
DOUBLE PRECISION X( 2, 2 )
CALL DLALN2( .FALSE., 1, 1, SMIN, ONE, T( J, J ),
$ ZERO, X, 2, SCALE, XNORM, IERR )
CALL DSCAL( KI, SCALE, WORK( 1+N ), 1 )
DO 90 J = KI - 2, 1, -1
IF( J.GT.JNXT )
$ GO TO 90
JNXT = J - 1
IF( J.GT.1 ) THEN
IF( T( J, J-1 ).NE.ZERO ) THEN
IF( WORK( J ).GT.BIGNUM / XNORM ) THEN
X( 1, 1 ) = X( 1, 1 ) / XNORM
END IF
END IF
CALL DLALN2( .FALSE., 2, 2, SMIN, ONE,
$ T( J-1, J-1 ), LDT, ONE, ONE,
$ XNORM, IERR )
CALL DAXPY( J-2, -X( 1, 1 ), T( 1, J-1 ), 1,
$ WORK( 1+N ), 1 )
CALL DAXPY( J-2, -X( 2, 2 ), T( 1, J ), 1,
$ WORK( 1+N2 ), 1 )
END IF
90 CONTINUE
END
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-04-28 11:55:23
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-28 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-28 12:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-28 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 12:45 -------
I have a patch for the gamess failure. What was the gromacs failure?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-28 12:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-28 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-28 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-28 13:36 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I have a patch for the gamess failure. What was the gromacs failure?
>
cc -c -o pdbio.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -ffast-math
-DSPEC_CPU_LP64 pdbio.c
pdbio.c: In function 'read_pdbfile':
pdbio.c:384: error: type mismatch in address expression
const char * restrict
char *
D.10701_504 = &line[29];
pdbio.c:384: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [pdbio.o] Error 1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 15:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-28 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 14:11 -------
int foo (__const char *__restrict __s);
static void
read_anisou(char line[])
{
foo (line+1);
}
void
read_pdbfile(void)
{
char line[4096];
read_anisou (line);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-28 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-28 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-28 15:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 14:04 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-28 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 15:27 -------
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 28 15:27:09 2009
New Revision: 146901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146901
Log:
2009-04-28 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/39937
* fold-const.c (fold_binary): Use distribute_real_division only
on float types.
* gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr39937.f: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr39937.f
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-28 15:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-29 14:04 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-29 14:06 ` rguenther at suse dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-29 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:04 -------
On Linux/x86-64, I got
gcc -c -o pp_sort.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DPERL_CORE -O3 -ffast-math
-funroll-loops -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -DSPEC_CPU_LINUX_X64 pp_sort.c
pp_sort.c: In function 'S_qsortsv':
pp_sort.c:1352: error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression
struct SV * *
struct SV * *
struct SV * *
vect_vec_iv_.1464_184 = vect_vec_iv_.1464_183 + vect_cst_.1463_182;
pp_sort.c:1352: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [pp_sort.o] Error 1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 14:04 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-29 14:06 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-04-29 14:06 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2009-04-29 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-29 14:06 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed
SPEC CPU 2006
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> ------- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:04 -------
> On Linux/x86-64, I got
>
> gcc -c -o pp_sort.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DPERL_CORE -O3 -ffast-math
> -funroll-loops -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -DSPEC_CPU_LINUX_X64 pp_sort.c
> pp_sort.c: In function 'S_qsortsv':
> pp_sort.c:1352: error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression
> struct SV * *
>
> struct SV * *
>
> struct SV * *
>
> vect_vec_iv_.1464_184 = vect_vec_iv_.1464_183 + vect_cst_.1463_182;
>
> pp_sort.c:1352: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> specmake[3]: *** [pp_sort.o] Error 1
Is that after or before
2009-04-28 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
* tree-vect-loop.c (get_initial_def_for_induction): Use
correct types for pointer increment.
?
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 14:06 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2009-04-29 14:06 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-29 14:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-29 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:06 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> On Linux/x86-64, I got
>
> gcc -c -o pp_sort.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DPERL_CORE -O3 -ffast-math
> -funroll-loops -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -DSPEC_CPU_LINUX_X64 pp_sort.c
> pp_sort.c: In function 'S_qsortsv':
> pp_sort.c:1352: error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression
> struct SV * *
>
> struct SV * *
>
> struct SV * *
>
> vect_vec_iv_.1464_184 = vect_vec_iv_.1464_183 + vect_cst_.1463_182;
>
> pp_sort.c:1352: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> specmake[3]: *** [pp_sort.o] Error 1
>
This is in perlbench.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 14:06 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-29 14:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-29 14:12 ` rguenther at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-29 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:10 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> 2009-04-28 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> * tree-vect-loop.c (get_initial_def_for_induction): Use
> correct types for pointer increment.
>
That is before and with revision 146920.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 14:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-29 14:12 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-04-29 14:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2009-04-29 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-29 14:12 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed
SPEC CPU 2006
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> ------- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:10 -------
> (In reply to comment #10)
>
> >
> > 2009-04-28 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
> >
> > * tree-vect-loop.c (get_initial_def_for_induction): Use
> > correct types for pointer increment.
> >
>
> That is before and with revision 146920.
Ok, it seems to work for me on current trunk.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 14:12 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2009-04-29 14:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-29 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 14:55 -------
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 29 14:54:54 2009
New Revision: 146972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146972
Log:
2009-04-29 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
Backport from mainline:
2009-04-29 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/39941
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39941.c: New testcase.
2009-04-29 Anmol P. Paralkar <anmol@freescale.com>
PR target/39565
* gcc.dg/pr39565.c: New testcase.
2009-04-28 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/39937
* gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr39937.f: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39941.c
- copied unchanged from r146971,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39941.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39565.c
- copied unchanged from r146971, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39565.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr39937.f
- copied unchanged from r146971,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr39937.f
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 14:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 15:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-29 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 15:06 -------
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 29 15:05:22 2009
New Revision: 146973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146973
Log:
2009-04-29 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/39937
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Do not
loose type conversions.
(forward_propagate_addr_expr): Fix tuplification bug. Remove
stmts only if there are no uses of its definition.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39937.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39937.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 15:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-29 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 15:06 -------
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed SPEC CPU 2006
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-29 15:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-29 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 15:55 -------
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 29 15:54:18 2009
New Revision: 146981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146981
Log:
2009-04-29 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
Backport from mainline:
2009-04-29 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/39937
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39937.c: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39937.c
- copied unchanged from r146980,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39937.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-29 15:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-28 4:24 [Bug middle-end/39937] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed SPEC CPU 2006 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 4:27 ` [Bug middle-end/39937] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 6:01 ` [Bug middle-end/39937] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 12:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 15:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 14:04 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-29 14:06 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-04-29 14:06 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-29 14:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-29 14:12 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-04-29 14:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-29 15:55 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).