From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20448 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2009 10:09:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 20385 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2009 10:09:48 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090430100948.20384.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/39968] [4.5 Regression] ./plugin-version.h:11: error: 'gcc_version' defined but not used In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg03047.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 10:09 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ./plugin-version.h:11: error: 'gcc_version' defined but not used On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Really I think plugin support is flawed. There should really be a shared > library which the plugins link against and this library is what the main GCC > links against too. This may be needed to support plugins on Windows hosts (and plugins do definitely need a common GCC-provided build infrastructure so that plugins people write will naturally build for other OSes as soon as support for them is added to that infrastructure), but we should not need to slow down GCC on Linux hosts by putting most of it in a shared library. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39968