public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
@ 2009-05-05 15:05 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 15:12 ` [Bug c/40026] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-05 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The linux kernel build on the gcc.opensuse.org base tester currently fails with
./cc1 -quiet sched.i
kernel/sched.c: In function 'build_sched_domains':
kernel/sched.c:6325: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000007caa09 in is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call (t=0x0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:633
633 if (is_gimple_reg_type (TREE_TYPE (t)))
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000007caa09 in is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call (t=0x0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:633
#1 0x00000000007f7fb0 in gimplify_expr (expr_p=0x7ffff4efb7f8,
pre_p=0x7fffffffb648, post_p=0x7fffffff8e28,
gimple_test_f=0x7ca9ed <is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call>, fallback=1)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:7159
#2 0x00000000007e4023 in gimplify_modify_expr (expr_p=0x7fffffff9718,
pre_p=0x7fffffffb648, post_p=0x7fffffff8e28, want_value=0 '\0')
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:4379
#3 0x00000000007f391d in gimplify_expr (expr_p=0x7fffffff9718,
pre_p=0x7fffffffb648, post_p=0x7fffffff8e28,
gimple_test_f=0x7bff1c <is_gimple_stmt>, fallback=0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:6516
#4 0x00000000007e8724 in gimplify_stmt (stmt_p=0x7fffffff9718,
seq_p=0x7fffffffb648) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:5162
#5 0x00000000007ca161 in gimplify_and_add (t=0x7ffff4efb7c0,
seq_p=0x7fffffffb648) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:390
#6 0x00000000007df18b in gimplify_init_ctor_eval (object=0x7ffff4efb240,
elts=0x7ffff4ef6200, pre_p=0x7fffffffb648, cleared=1 '\1')
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimplify.c:3490
#7 0x00000000007e0c65 in gimplify_init_constructor (expr_p=0x7ffff4ed8f10,
pre_p=0x7fffffffb648, post_p=0x7fffffffa288, want_value=0 '\0',
notify_temp_creation=0 '\0')
--
Summary: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-05 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 15:54 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-05 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 15:12 -------
Reduced testcase, maybe due to the C const expression changes(?)
typedef struct {
unsigned long bits[(((128)+64 -1)/64)];
} cpumask_t;
struct sched_domain {
cpumask_t span;
int flags;
};
void
cpu_to_allnodes_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int sched_smt_power_savings)
{
*sd = (struct sched_domain) {
.span = (cpumask_t) { { [0 ... (((128)+64 -1)/64)-1] = 0UL } },
.flags = (sched_smt_power_savings ? 256 : 0),
};
}
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|middle-end |c
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 15:12 ` [Bug c/40026] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-05 15:54 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-06 11:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-05 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 15:12 ` [Bug c/40026] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 15:54 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-06 11:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-05-06 11:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-05-06 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-06 11:09 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
On Tue, 5 May 2009, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Reduced testcase, maybe due to the C const expression changes(?)
I see nothing in the reported information about this bug to suggest this
(rather than, say, the move of COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR handling to
language-independent code). What do you think is wrong about the trees
being passed by the C front end to the gimplifier?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-06 11:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-05-06 11:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-05-09 18:09 ` [Bug middle-end/40026] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2009-05-06 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-05-06 11:41 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE during
gimplify_init_constructor
On Wed, 6 May 2009, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
>
> On Tue, 5 May 2009, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> > Reduced testcase, maybe due to the C const expression changes(?)
>
> I see nothing in the reported information about this bug to suggest this
> (rather than, say, the move of COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR handling to
> language-independent code). What do you think is wrong about the trees
> being passed by the C front end to the gimplifier?
It was just wild guessing - the COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR changes may be
indeed a better guess.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-06 11:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2009-05-09 18:09 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-11 7:02 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-09 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-09 18:09 -------
gimplify_init_constructor does
tree ctor = TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 1);
...
new_ctor = optimize_compound_literals_in_ctor (ctor);
elts = CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (new_ctor);
...
gimplify_init_ctor_preeval (&TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 1),
pre_p, post_p, &preeval_data);
(which changes a COND_EXPR to have void type, updating the pointer to
that COND_EXPR in TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 1) - the old constructor -
to point to the gimplifier-generated temorary instead)
...
if (!cleared || num_nonzero_elements > 0)
gimplify_init_ctor_eval (object, elts, pre_p, cleared);
(which goes through the elements of the new constructor, finds the
modified COND_EXPR and ends up segfaulting because of that).
This looks like the compound literal changes must be responsible and
that it is a gimplifier bug.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bonzini at gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c |middle-end
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-05-09 18:09:03
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-09 18:09 ` [Bug middle-end/40026] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-11 7:02 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-05-11 9:04 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-05-11 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-05-11 07:02 -------
I have a patch. It's just that TREE_OPERAND (*expr, 1) must be changed to
new_ctor.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-05-09 18:09:03 |2009-05-11 07:02:26
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-11 7:02 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-11 9:04 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-05-11 16:06 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-21 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-05-11 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-05-11 09:04 -------
Created an attachment (id=17850)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17850&action=view)
patch to fix the bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-11 9:04 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-11 16:06 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-21 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-11 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-05-11 16:06 -------
Subject: Bug 40026
Author: bonzini
Date: Mon May 11 16:05:45 2009
New Revision: 147386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147386
Log:
2009-05-11 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
PR tree-optimization/40026
* gimplify.c (gimplify_init_constructor): Change initial conditional
to assertion. Rewrite TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 1) after
optimize_compound_literals_in_ctor.
testsuite:
2009-05-11 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40026.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40026.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/gimplify.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-11 16:06 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-21 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-21 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-21 10:29 -------
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-21 10:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-05 15:05 [Bug middle-end/40026] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 15:12 ` [Bug c/40026] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-05 15:54 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-06 11:09 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-05-06 11:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-05-09 18:09 ` [Bug middle-end/40026] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-11 7:02 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-05-11 9:04 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-05-11 16:06 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-21 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).