From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4492 invoked by alias); 12 May 2009 14:55:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 3631 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2009 14:55:07 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090512145507.3630.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/40115] -O2 and higher causes wrong label address calculation In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg01019.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 14:55 ------- No labels are not designed that way. They are designed only for jumping and when they are taken the address of, there should only be used for jumping and nothing else. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40115