From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10664 invoked by alias); 12 May 2009 19:34:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 10605 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2009 19:34:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 19:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090512193444.10604.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/39509] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] bad optimization(?) pure virtual function call with -O2 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg01051.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 19:34 ------- Ah, there are two different adaptor variables after inlining, so this might as well be a dup of PR39604. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39509