From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-284100-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6606 invoked by alias); 13 May 2009 18:57:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 6566 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2009 18:56:51 -0000
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20090513185651.6565.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-39942-17483@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug target/39942] Nonoptimal code - leaveq; xchg   %ax,%ax; retq
In-Reply-To: <bug-39942-17483@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "vvv at ru dot ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg01141.txt.bz2



------- Comment #25 from vvv at ru dot ru  2009-05-13 18:56 -------
(In reply to comment #22)
> CCing H.J for Intel optimization issues.

VVV> 1. AMD limitation for 16-bytes page (memory range XXXXXXX0 - XXXXXXXF),
but
VVV> Intel limitation for 16-bytes chunk  (memory range XXXXXXXX -
XXXXXXXX+10h)

I have a doubt about this now. Sanks to Richard Guenther (Comment #20). So I am
going to make measurements for check it for Core2.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39942