From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25092 invoked by alias); 13 May 2009 19:06:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 24506 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2009 19:05:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 19:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090513190545.24505.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/39942] Nonoptimal code - leaveq; xchg %ax,%ax; retq In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "vvv at ru dot ru" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg01142.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #26 from vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-13 19:05 ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Note that we need something that works for the generic model as well, which in > this case looks like it is the same as for AMD models. There is processor property TARGET_FOUR_JUMP_LIMIT, may be create new one - TARGET_FIVE_JUMP_LIMIT? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39942