public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/39942] Nonoptimal code - leaveq; xchg %ax,%ax; retq Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20090514151555.3232.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-39942-17483@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #31 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 15:15 ------- Some -O2 code size data from today's trunk bootstraps. The first .text line is always vanilla bootstrap, the second one with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg00702.html only, the third one with that patch and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg00703.html and the last with additional: --- i386.c.jj3 2009-05-14 12:41:24.000000000 +0200 +++ i386.c 2009-05-14 14:48:24.000000000 +0200 @@ -27202,7 +27202,7 @@ x86_function_profiler (FILE *file, int l static int min_insn_size (rtx insn) { - int l = 0; + int l = 0, len; if (!INSN_P (insn) || !active_insn_p (insn)) return 0; @@ -27222,7 +27222,8 @@ min_insn_size (rtx insn) && symbolic_reference_mentioned_p (PATTERN (insn)) && !SIBLING_CALL_P (insn)) return 5; - if (get_attr_length (insn) <= 1) + len = get_attr_length (insn); + if (len <= 1) return 1; /* For normal instructions we may rely on the sizes of addresses @@ -27230,6 +27231,9 @@ min_insn_size (rtx insn) This is not the case for jumps where references are PC relative. */ if (!JUMP_P (insn)) { + if (get_attr_type (insn) != TYPE_MULTI) + return len; + l = get_attr_length_address (insn); if (l < 4 && symbolic_reference_mentioned_p (PATTERN (insn))) l = 4; to see how the code size changes with much more accurate (though sometimes not minimum but maximum bound) insn sizing for the algorithm. 64-bit cc1plus [12] .text PROGBITS 000000000047f990 07f990 8c3ba8 00 AX 0 0 16 [12] .text PROGBITS 000000000047f990 07f990 89b1e8 00 AX 0 0 16 [12] .text PROGBITS 000000000047f9c0 07f9c0 899f78 00 AX 0 0 16 [12] .text PROGBITS 000000000047f9c0 07f9c0 88eaf8 00 AX 0 0 16 32-bit cc1plus [12] .text PROGBITS 080b24e0 06a4e0 8f8cac 00 AX 0 0 16 [12] .text PROGBITS 080b24e0 06a4e0 8d516c 00 AX 0 0 16 [12] .text PROGBITS 080b2510 06a510 8d507c 00 AX 0 0 16 [12] .text PROGBITS 080b2510 06a510 8cbd7c 00 AX 0 0 16 For 64-bit cc1plus that's 1.8%, 1.86%, 2.36% smaller binary with the 1, 2 resp. 3 patches, for 32-bit cc1plus 1.55%, 1.56%, 1.96% smaller binary. So the first patch is the most important and something like the third one, perhaps with more exceptions, also makes a difference. I'll now try to update my awk script to check for the AMD rules, namely that the last byte of the branch insn counts rather than the first. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39942
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 15:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-04-28 12:20 [Bug c/39942] New: " vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-28 13:42 ` [Bug target/39942] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 17:05 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-28 17:10 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-28 17:15 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-28 17:37 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-04-28 21:19 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-28 21:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 21:47 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-04-28 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 21:54 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 7:46 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-29 7:55 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-29 9:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 10:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 19:17 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-04-30 9:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 16:41 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-13 8:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 11:43 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-13 13:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 17:13 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-13 18:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-05-13 18:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 18:45 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-13 18:57 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-13 19:06 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-13 19:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 19:19 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-13 21:44 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-14 9:01 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-14 15:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2009-05-14 15:58 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-14 18:37 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-14 19:44 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-15 2:23 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-15 4:32 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-15 7:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 12:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 12:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 14:35 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-15 16:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 18:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 18:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 23:06 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-16 6:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 7:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 7:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 17:21 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-20 21:38 ` vvv at ru dot ru 2009-05-20 22:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-21 13:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-21 13:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-39942-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2020-04-14 21:20 ` peter at cordes dot ca
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20090514151555.3232.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).