From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13014 invoked by alias); 18 May 2009 15:36:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12512 invoked by alias); 18 May 2009 15:36:39 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090518153639.12511.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/36947] Attributes not fully checked comparing actual vs dummy procedure In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "w6ws at earthlink dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg01541.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from w6ws at earthlink dot net 2009-05-18 15:36 ------- Subject: Re: Attributes not fully checked comparing actual vs dummy procedure Janus, janus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 09:36 ------- > The commit in comment #6 implements the checking for intents. > > ToDo: > > * check for OPTIONAL > * better error messages > * recursive check (see comment #2) I was going to comment that OPTIONAL should be checked too, but you beat me to it. We have been having problems with both OPTIONAL and INTENT not being checked by various compilers. NAG, of course, does a better job than most in this area. It is good to see gfortran learn about this checking too. Thank you for your hard work on this! Walter -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36947