From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27496 invoked by alias); 27 May 2009 10:28:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 27446 invoked by uid 48); 27 May 2009 10:27:59 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090527102759.27445.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/40019] LEADZ and TRAILZ give wrong results In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg02113.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-27 10:27 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't think your patch fixes the following, > > print *, leadz(-1_1), leadz(-1_2), leadz(-1_4), leadz(-1_8), leadz(-1_16) > > which yields > > 7 15 31 63 127 I think it does: $ cat h.f90 print *, leadz(-1_1), leadz(-1_2), leadz(-1_4), leadz(-1_8), leadz(-1_16) end $ gfortran h.f90 && ./a.out 0 0 0 0 0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40019