From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7413 invoked by alias); 28 May 2009 07:05:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 7358 invoked by uid 48); 28 May 2009 07:05:31 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090528070531.7357.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/29212] ICE with -fipa-pta In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg02182.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-28 07:05 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Subject: Re: ICE with -fipa-pta > As the person working on ipa-pta, I'm happy for you to file bug > reports against ipa-pta, but I should warn you that a lot of these > bugs are just going to magically disappear one day when some bug fixes > to other parts of gcc are merged from the ipa-branch :) > A lot are not really ipa-pta bugs, they are just things i have not > worked around because I am waiting for the real fixes to go in. what's the status of the ipa-branch, has it been merged? -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29212