public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
@ 2008-03-14 20:11 niemayer at isg dot de
2008-03-14 22:45 ` [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: niemayer at isg dot de @ 2008-03-14 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
When compiling the following tiny example .cxx source with "-Wall -O2", I get
spurious warnings:
------------- cut example test.cxx here --------------
extern void function(void * x);
struct A {
long x;
char d[0];
};
void test(A * a) {
function((char *)a - 4); // gcc emits warning, here - why?
}
// ------------
struct B {
char d[0];
};
void test(B * b) {
char * c = (char *)b;
void * v = c-1;
function(v); // gcc emits warning, here - why?
}
------------- cut here --------------
The output of
> gcc -Wall -c test.cxx -O2
is:
/tmp/test.cxx: In function ‘void test(B*)’:
/tmp/test.cxx:22: warning: array subscript is below array bounds
/tmp/test.cxx: In function ‘void test(A*)’:
/tmp/test.cxx:10: warning: array subscript is below array bounds
I have not found a sane way in my non-example, real-world code to avoid those
warnings.
--
Summary: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds"
with void* function argument plus -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: niemayer at isg dot de
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
@ 2008-03-14 22:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-14 22:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-14 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 22:44 -------
I'll have a look.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-03-14 22:44:35 |2008-03-14 22:44:50
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
2008-03-14 22:45 ` [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-14 22:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-15 14:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-14 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 22:44 -------
Because we fold the pointer addition to &a->d[-8] ;)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c++ |middle-end
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-03-14 22:44:35
date| |
Summary|spurious warning "array |[4.3 Regression] spurious
|subscript is below array |warning "array subscript is
|bounds" with void* function |below array bounds" with
|argument plus -O2 |void* function argument plus
| |-O2
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
2008-03-14 22:45 ` [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-14 22:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-15 14:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-15 16:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-15 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-15 14:28 -------
Subject: Bug 35593
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Mar 15 14:27:55 2008
New Revision: 133249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133249
Log:
2008-03-15 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/35593
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (maybe_fold_offset_to_array_ref): Make sure
to not produce negative array indices if not allowed. Add
parameter to indicate that.
(maybe_fold_offset_to_component_ref): Allow negative array
indices only for the first member of a structure.
(maybe_fold_offset_to_reference): Allow negative array indices.
(maybe_fold_stmt_addition): Likewise.
* g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-3.C: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-3.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-15 14:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-15 16:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-15 19:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-15 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-15 16:09 -------
Fixed on the trunk.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|minor |normal
Keywords| |diagnostic
Known to fail| |4.3.0
Known to work| |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-15 16:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-15 19:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-18 17:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-15 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-15 19:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-18 17:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-18 17:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-03 5:07 ` at dot wufei at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-18 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 17:24 -------
Subject: Bug 35593
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 18 17:23:35 2008
New Revision: 133318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133318
Log:
2008-03-18 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline:
2008-03-15 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/35593
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (maybe_fold_offset_to_array_ref): Make sure
to not produce negative array indices if not allowed. Add
parameter to indicate that.
(maybe_fold_offset_to_component_ref): Allow negative array
indices only for the first member of a structure.
(maybe_fold_offset_to_reference): Allow negative array indices.
(maybe_fold_stmt_addition): Likewise.
* g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-3.C: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-3.C
- copied unchanged from r133249,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-3.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-18 17:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-18 17:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-03 5:07 ` at dot wufei at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-18 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-18 17:28 -------
And the branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-18 17:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-03 5:07 ` at dot wufei at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: at dot wufei at gmail dot com @ 2009-06-03 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from at dot wufei at gmail dot com 2009-06-03 05:07 -------
Did the patch fixes the second case (struct B)? It still warns on 4.3 branch,
but no problem on 4.4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-03 5:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-14 20:11 [Bug c++/35593] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds" with void* function argument plus -O2 niemayer at isg dot de
2008-03-14 22:45 ` [Bug middle-end/35593] [4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-14 22:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-15 14:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-15 16:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-15 19:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-18 17:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-18 17:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-03 5:07 ` at dot wufei at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).