From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7703 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2009 20:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 7616 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jun 2009 20:16:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090609201614.7615.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/39252] Request new feature __builtin_not_reached(); In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "daney at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-09 20:16 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Wouldn't be a special "noreturn" clobber in inline asm better suited for this > then? > See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-01/msg00190.html for an opposing opinion. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39252