From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19193 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2009 20:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 19146 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jun 2009 20:58:46 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090610205846.19145.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/40389] optimizer bug (possibly) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jason at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00672.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-10 20:58 ------- Incidentally, the testcase can be simplified by removing the body of the copy constructor, i.e. reducing it to just the declaration H (const H &h); since it isn't actually called. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40389