public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/40149] New: variable length still 6 ???
@ 2009-05-14 17:10 plivings at arb dot ca dot gov
2009-05-14 17:46 ` [Bug fortran/40149] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: plivings at arb dot ca dot gov @ 2009-05-14 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Failed on assigning values to an array in a simple loop with the following
structure:
" IARRAY2 = 0
DO I = 2, 341
IARRAY2 = IARRAY2 + 1
PBLJARRAYPT(I,I,NCSP0) = IARRAY2
ENDDO
"
Is the length of variables still 6 nowadays?
--
Summary: variable length still 6 ???
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: plivings at arb dot ca dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40149
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ??? 2009-05-14 17:10 [Bug fortran/40149] New: variable length still 6 ??? plivings at arb dot ca dot gov @ 2009-05-14 17:46 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-14 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 17:46 ------- Fortran bug reports are never given a Severity of Blocker. That value is reserved for problems with C/C++. Please attach the smallest compilable example that exhibits the problem and provide the exact command line used. Your small code snippet and your interpretation of the problem is insufficient. I just noticed that you reported the problem against 4.1.2. Updating to 4.4.0 and 4.3.x is advised. Finally, no 6 characters is no longer the limit and it has never been the limit in gfortran. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |normal Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40149 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ??? 2009-05-14 17:10 [Bug fortran/40149] New: variable length still 6 ??? plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-05-14 17:46 ` [Bug fortran/40149] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-12 17:17 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 18:03 ` plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-06-12 18:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-12 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 ------- i created a compilable example from the code snippet given: INTEGER PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) INTEGER NCSP0,IARRAY2,I NCSP0 = 1 IARRAY2 = 0 DO I = 2, 341 IARRAY2 = IARRAY2 + 1 PBLJARRAYPT(I,I,NCSP0) = IARRAY2 END DO PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) END When ran, it gives PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) = 1 PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) = 2 PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) = 340 which looks fine to me. Unless more info is forthcoming on reproducing this bug, I think we should close it with no further action taken. It's only been open a month, doesn't hurt to let it sit for another :) --bud -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40149 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ??? 2009-05-14 17:10 [Bug fortran/40149] New: variable length still 6 ??? plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-05-14 17:46 ` [Bug fortran/40149] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-12 18:03 ` plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-06-12 18:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: plivings at arb dot ca dot gov @ 2009-06-12 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-06-12 18:03 ------- Subject: RE: variable length still 6 ??? Bud, Thanks for your response to my earlier bug report, and sorry for not informing you earlier that the bug was apparently related to the computer OS-Compiler mismatch. I had the OS-compiler changed to 64-bit from 32-bit, and the problem disappeared. Thanks again for your attention and time. With best regards, Paul -----Original Message----- From: bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:17 AM To: Livingstone, Paul@ARB Subject: [Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ??? ------- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 ------- i created a compilable example from the code snippet given: INTEGER PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) INTEGER NCSP0,IARRAY2,I NCSP0 = 1 IARRAY2 = 0 DO I = 2, 341 IARRAY2 = IARRAY2 + 1 PBLJARRAYPT(I,I,NCSP0) = IARRAY2 END DO PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) END When ran, it gives PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) = 1 PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) = 2 PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) = 340 which looks fine to me. Unless more info is forthcoming on reproducing this bug, I think we should close it with no further action taken. It's only been open a month, doesn't hurt to let it sit for another :) --bud -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40149 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ??? 2009-05-14 17:10 [Bug fortran/40149] New: variable length still 6 ??? plivings at arb dot ca dot gov ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2009-06-12 18:03 ` plivings at arb dot ca dot gov @ 2009-06-12 18:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-12 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 18:08 ------- Closing -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40149 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-12 18:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-05-14 17:10 [Bug fortran/40149] New: variable length still 6 ??? plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-05-14 17:46 ` [Bug fortran/40149] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 18:03 ` plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-06-12 18:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).