[Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug boehm-gc/40385]  New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures
@ 2009-06-09 10:32 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-06-09 10:38 ` [Bug boehm-gc/40385] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 more replies)
  0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-06-09 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

On Linux/ia64, revision 148285:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00265.html

caused:

FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is %.1f
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern
test, is %.1f
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is %.1f
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is %.1f
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -Os output pattern test, is %.1f
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -Os execution test


-- 
           Summary: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: boehm-gc
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug boehm-gc/40385] [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-06-09 10:38 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-06-09 14:19 ` [Bug libffi/40385] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-09 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-09 10:38 -------
These are new tests, and real bugs.  They are not regressions, and may be
XFAILed on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-06-09 10:38 ` [Bug boehm-gc/40385] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-09 14:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-06-11 20:46 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-09 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-06-09 10:38 ` [Bug boehm-gc/40385] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-06-09 14:19 ` [Bug libffi/40385] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-11 20:46 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2009-06-13 19:23 ` [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-06-11 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-06-11 20:46 -------
You can add *-apple-darwin9 to the list of platforms on which these tests fail:

/Volumes/MacBook/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/gcc/xgcc  version 4.5.0 20090611
(experimental) [trunk revision 148383] (GCC) 

                === libffi tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test

                === libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes            1594
# of unexpected failures        10
# of unsupported tests          15

Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 1.0
0.0
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 output pattern test, is 1.0 0.0
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O3 output pattern test, is 1.0 0.0
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -Os output pattern test, is 1.0 0.0
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern
test, is 1.0 0.0
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test

                === libffi Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes            1579
# of unexpected failures        20
# of unsupported tests          15

                === libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes            3173
# of unexpected failures        30
# of unsupported tests          30

See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-06/msg00821.html for ppc.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-11 20:46 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-06-13 19:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-06-15  9:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-13 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-13 19:23 -------
As mentioned, this is not a regression, just new testcase changing the summary
and removing the target milestone.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-06-13 19:23:03
               date|                            |
            Summary|[4.5 regression] Revision   |new testcases bought in by
                   |148285 caused many failures |Revision 148285 fail on ia64
   Target Milestone|4.5.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-13 19:23 ` [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-15  9:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2009-06-15  9:07 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-06-15  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-06-15 09:05 -------
I have applied the following patch on revision 148472

diff -up libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c
/opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c
--- libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c  2009-06-12 19:21:34.000000000
+0200
+++ /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c   
2009-06-15 00:31:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
    PR:                 none.
    Originator: Blake Chaffin 6/6/2007   */

-/* { dg-do run { xfail mips*-*-* arm*-*-* strongarm*-*-* xscale*-*-*
i*86-*-linux-* x86_64-*-linux-* sh*-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-do run { xfail mips*-*-* arm*-*-* strongarm*-*-* xscale*-*-*
i*86-*-linux-* x86_64-*-linux-* sh*-*-* *-apple-* } } */
 #include "ffitest.h"

 static void
diff -up libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c
/opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c
--- libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c      2009-06-12
19:21:34.000000000 +0200
+++ /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c       
2009-06-15 00:31:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
    PR:                 none.
    Originator: Blake Chaffin 6/6/2007   */

-/* { dg-do run { xfail mips*-*-* arm*-*-* strongarm*-*-* xscale*-*-*
i*86-*-linux-* x86_64-*-linux-* sh*-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-do run { xfail mips*-*-* arm*-*-* strongarm*-*-* xscale*-*-*
i*86-*-linux-* x86_64-*-linux-* sh*-*-* *-apple-* } } */
 #include "ffitest.h"

 int main (void)

and I get:

                === libffi tests ===


Running target unix

                === libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes            1594
# of expected failures          10
# of unsupported tests          15

Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn3.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn4.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn5.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn6.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_12byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_16byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_18byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_19byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_24byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_64byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_8byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_double.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_float.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_pointer.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint32.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint64.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint32.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint64.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_float.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_schar.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshort.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshortchar.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_uchar.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushort.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushortchar.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_schar.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sint.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sshort.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulonglong.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct10.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct4.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct6.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct7.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct8.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct9.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/problem1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn3.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn4.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn5.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn6.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_12byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_16byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_18byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_19byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_24byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_64byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_8byte.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_double.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_float.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_pointer.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint32.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint64.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint32.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint64.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_float.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_schar.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshort.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshortchar.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_uchar.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushort.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushortchar.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_schar.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sint.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sshort.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulonglong.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct10.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct4.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct6.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct7.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct8.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct9.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/problem1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn3.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn4.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn5.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn6.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_12byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_16byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_18byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_19byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte1.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_24byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_64byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_8byte.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_double.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_float.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_pointer.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint32.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint64.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint32.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint64.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_float.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_schar.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshort.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshortchar.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_uchar.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushort.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushortchar.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_schar.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sint.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sshort.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulonglong.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct1.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct10.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct4.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct6.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct7.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct8.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct9.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/problem1.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn3.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn4.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn5.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn6.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_12byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_16byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_18byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_19byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte1.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_24byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_64byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_8byte.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_double.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_float.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_pointer.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint32.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint64.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint32.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint64.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_float.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_schar.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshort.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshortchar.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_uchar.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushort.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushortchar.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_schar.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sint.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sshort.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulonglong.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct1.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct10.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct4.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct6.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct7.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct8.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct9.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/problem1.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn3.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn4.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn5.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn6.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_12byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_16byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_18byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_19byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte1.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_24byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_64byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_8byte.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_double.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_float.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution
test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_pointer.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint32.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint64.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint32.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint64.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_float.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_schar.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshort.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshortchar.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution
test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_uchar.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushort.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushortchar.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution
test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_schar.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sint.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_sshort.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulonglong.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct1.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct10.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct4.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct6.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct7.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct8.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct9.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/problem1.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.special/unwindtest.cc  -shared-libgcc -lstdc++ execution test
FAIL: libffi.special/unwindtest.cc  -shared-libgcc -lstdc++ execution test
FAIL: libffi.special/unwindtest.cc  -shared-libgcc -lstdc++ execution test
FAIL: libffi.special/unwindtest.cc  -shared-libgcc -lstdc++ execution test

                === libffi Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes            776
# of unexpected failures        409
# of expected failures          10
# of unsupported tests          15

                === libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes            2370
# of unexpected failures        409
# of expected failures          20
# of unsupported tests          30

So libffi has been badly broken for -m64 by some revision between 148383 and
148472.

Also could someone answer the question I asked on
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00929.html:

> Is there any platform on which testsuite/libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c and 
> err_bad_typedef.c pass? see pr40385.

It was not meant to be a (bad) joke.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-15  9:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-06-15  9:07 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-06-15  9:09 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-15  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-15 09:07 -------
That probably is my fault.  However, I can't do anything about it until I see
the testsuite log file.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-15  9:07 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-15  9:09 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-06-15  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-15  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-15 09:08 -------
Re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00929.html:

That was answered on Fri, 12 Jun by Kaz Kojima.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-15  9:09 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-15  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2009-06-15  9:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-06-15  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-06-15 09:19 -------
> That probably is my fault.  However, I can't do anything about it until I see
> the testsuite log file.

The log file looks like:

...
Executing on host: /opt/gcc/i686-darwin/gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/gcc/
/opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/closure_fn0.c  -O0 -W -Wall 
-I/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libffi/include
-I/opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/../include 
-I/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libffi/include/..
-L/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libffi/.libs
-L/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs 
-shared-libgcc -lffi -lm   -m64 -o ./closure_fn0.exe    (timeout = 300)
PASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors)
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
.:/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/gcc:/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libffi/.libs:/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:.:/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/gcc:/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libffi/.libs:/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/x86_64/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
...

Quite terse, isn't it? What would you need precisely?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-15  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-06-15  9:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2009-06-15  9:29 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-06-15  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-06-15 09:24 -------
> That was answered on Fri, 12 Jun by Kaz Kojima.

Not exactly, it answered about some future goal of the tests, but without any
name of platform(s) on which they work. My implicit question is "does it make
any sense to add XFAILed platforms instead of *-*-*, if the tests do not pass
on any known platform?"


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-15  9:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-06-15  9:29 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-06-15  9:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2010-04-14 22:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-15  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-15 09:29 -------
I need to know why it's crashing.  Usually there's some sort of error message. 
If there's not, there's no choice but to debug.

This Darwin problem is clearly not the same bug as 40385, so it needs a new
Bugzilla entry.

I expect that a patch to xfail err_bad_abi.c on *-*-* would be approved.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-15  9:29 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-15  9:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2010-04-14 22:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-06-15  9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-06-15 09:42 -------
> This Darwin problem is clearly not the same bug as 40385, so it needs a new
> Bugzilla entry.

This is now pr40444.

> I expect that a patch to xfail err_bad_abi.c on *-*-* would be approved.

Probably err_bad_typedef.c also.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64
  2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-06-15  9:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-04-14 22:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2010-04-14 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from sje at cup dot hp dot com  2010-04-14 22:29 -------
I am going to close out this bug report since there are currently no failures
on IA64, only expected failures for libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c and
libffi.call/err_bad_typedef.c which are XFAIL'ed for all platforms.


-- 

sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sje at cup dot hp dot com
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-14 22:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-09 10:32 [Bug boehm-gc/40385] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 148285 caused many failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-06-09 10:38 ` [Bug boehm-gc/40385] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-09 14:19 ` [Bug libffi/40385] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-11 20:46 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-06-13 19:23 ` [Bug libffi/40385] new testcases bought in by Revision 148285 fail on ia64 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-15  9:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-06-15  9:07 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-15  9:09 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-15  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-06-15  9:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-06-15  9:29 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-15  9:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-14 22:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).