[Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!

[Bug c++/40434] New: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!

[d3607773 at bsnow dot net]

Hello

line 14 of the attached code does compile fine on gcc 4.4.0, although it should
not according to 8.3.5p5 (pair(pair&& __p):
first(std::move(__p.first)),second(std::move(__p.second)) { } get triggered -
afaik this no exception to the rule)

Is this a bug or am I missing something?

Thank you


-- 
           Summary: g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: d3607773 at bsnow dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434

[Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|major                       |normal
            Summary|g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! |[C++0x] g++ does not obey
                   |                            |8.3.5p5?!


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434

[Bug c++/40434] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!

[d3607773 at bsnow dot net]

------- Comment #1 from d3607773 at bsnow dot net  2009-06-13 16:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=17991)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17991&action=view)
testcase


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434

[Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!

[jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #2 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com  2009-06-15 12:06 -------
8.3.5p5? is that reference right?
and I assume you mean line 10, not line 14.

The pair(pair&&) constructor is not in the WP. Commenting it out causes the
pair(pair<U,V>&&) constructor to be used, which fails to compile (as with the
next line.)


-- 

jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot
                   |                            |com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434

[Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!

[jason at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-19 00:19 -------
pair(pair&&) is in the WP now.

4.5 gives no errors for the testcase, which I believe is correct; it's OK to
bind an rvalue to a const lvalue reference.


-- 

jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434

[Bug c++/40434] [C++0x] g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?!

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-12-26 13:57 -------
Works fine in mainline indeed.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40434