public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mrsam at courier-mta dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/13631] Problems in messages Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:53:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20090615215320.21485.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-13631-4127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #18 from mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-15 21:53 ------- Yes, the patch does add a new data member to the class. I see that this would fall under item #8 under "prohibited changes", although, as I said, AFAIK it won't actually break binary compatibility with existing applications, for the reasons I outlined. I think I see a way of doing this without changing the existing std::messages class, but it's ugly. Basically -- I think I can subclass std::messages and put the new data member into the subclass (__gnu_internal::messages?), then override all the virtual methods and find all places in libstdc++ that instantiate std::messages, and change them to instantiate __gnu_internal::messages. I was able to find two places in libstdc++ that instantiate std::messages, which would be changed to instantiate __gnu_internal::messages instead. If I missed any, the results won't be catastrophic -- I think anything that falls through the cracks would just fall back to using the existing implementation, and that can always be fixed up later. This patch would be bigger and uglier (and I'd still like my first one better), but before I try to write it up, is there any reason, that I'm missing, why this approach wouldn't work? One other detail -- anyone know which version of glibc first had libintl that implemented dgettext()? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13631
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 21:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-13631-4127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2009-06-14 14:55 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-14 17:14 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-14 17:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-14 18:25 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-14 18:57 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-15 11:13 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-15 11:36 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-15 21:53 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com [this message] 2009-06-15 22:06 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-15 22:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-15 23:10 ` peturrun at gmail dot com 2009-06-15 23:15 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-16 3:51 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-16 10:07 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-16 11:08 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-16 19:51 ` peturrun at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 21:54 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com 2009-06-16 22:04 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-19 0:47 ` mrsam at courier-mta dot com [not found] <bug-13631-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-01-14 21:49 ` fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05 21:34 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-05 22:27 ` mrsam@courier-mta.com 2014-12-03 19:47 ` fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-03 20:52 ` fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-18 16:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2004-01-09 13:05 [Bug libstdc++/13631] New: " peturr02 at ru dot is 2004-01-09 13:07 ` [Bug libstdc++/13631] " peturr02 at ru dot is 2004-01-09 13:07 ` peturr02 at ru dot is 2004-01-11 10:52 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-13 15:38 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-13 16:19 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-13 16:36 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-14 16:47 ` peturr02 at ru dot is 2004-01-16 18:15 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-19 11:44 ` peturr02 at ru dot is 2004-09-17 21:16 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20090615215320.21485.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).