From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8092 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2009 10:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 8038 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jun 2009 10:26:32 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090616102632.8037.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/40359] [4.5 Regression] Revision 148211 caused a lot of failures in the vect test suite. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg01040.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-16 10:26 ------- > Yes, the problem is that we think that the test is correct and it doesn't work > because of some syntax/brackets/space problems. I certainly don't understand the "space" mess. Before reaching the patch in comment #14 I have tried several variations. All of them, but the one in comment #14, either did not fix the failure with -m64 or did fail the test with -m32. In particular replacing 'target' with 'xfail' fixed the -m64 failure but the test failed with -m32. What are the expected patterns for the 3 variables with -m32 and -m64? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40359