public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/40497] invalid std::next / std::prev declaration
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090621110826.8632.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-40497-17859@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #16 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-21 11:08 -------
This is interesting and indeed, I'm not at all sure it's a C++ bug, but I seem
to remember an open PR about SFINAE vs defaults, we should check. As regards
the library side, anyway, I'm against putting in place ugly workarounds, do not
really make sense in this case. These next/prev are supposed to be very
straightforward facilities, straightforward to implement when concepts are
available. If it turns out they just make more difficult testing the other
C++0x bits we already have in place we'll simply remove the code for now: let's
make sure we don't ship 4.4.1 with this issue open.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |paolo dot carlini at oracle
| |dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40497
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-21 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-20 1:05 [Bug c++/40497] New: " e28773 at bsnow dot net
2009-06-20 10:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/40497] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-20 12:30 ` e28773 at bsnow dot net
2009-06-20 12:31 ` e28773 at bsnow dot net
2009-06-20 12:32 ` e28773 at bsnow dot net
2009-06-20 12:33 ` e28773 at bsnow dot net
2009-06-20 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-20 21:36 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-06-20 22:27 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-20 22:27 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-20 22:29 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-06-20 23:21 ` e28773 at bsnow dot net
2009-06-21 1:04 ` [Bug c++/40497] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-06-21 1:05 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-06-21 10:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-21 10:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-21 11:08 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com [this message]
2009-07-22 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-26 14:46 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-07-26 15:45 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-07-27 1:08 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-27 5:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-27 9:34 ` [Bug libstdc++/40497] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-10-15 12:53 ` [Bug libstdc++/40497] [C++0x] troubles with std::next / std::prev declarations jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-16 16:15 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-12-17 11:55 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-12-17 12:01 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-12-17 12:07 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-12-17 12:11 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-12-17 12:23 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-12-17 12:25 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-12-18 0:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-18 0:59 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30 8:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-27 10:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-27 10:51 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-05-27 11:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-27 11:59 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-05-27 16:25 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-05-27 17:37 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-27 17:45 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-27 17:46 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090621110826.8632.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).