public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/40486] [c++0x] rvalue-references no longer bind to lvalues
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090623184014.28154.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-40486-15652@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #9 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com  2009-06-23 18:40 -------
The library pieces of Doug's patch that still need to be applied are:

        * include/std/tuple (_Tuple_impl): Use lvalue references when
        explicitly specifying the template argument to std::move.

        * include/std/iosfwd (operator<<): Provide a forwarding operator<<
        that accepts rvalue streams.
        (operator>>): Ditto.

        * include/bits/stl_iterator.h (move_iterator::operator*):
        Explicitly std::move the result, to convert it to an rvalue
        reference.

        * include/bits/stl_move.h (forward): Forward lvalues (which may
        end up being turned into rvalues).
        (move): Explicitly static_cast to an rvalue.

        * testsuite/27_io/rvalue_streams.cc: New; test the use of rvalue
        streams. Works except for the fact that we can't call str() on the
        result. (This is an existing issue).

I think the move_iterator and tuple changes would be OK to apply now but the
stream parts have a FIXME and as discussed, the definition of std::move is
undecided.  I'll come back to this soon.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40486


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-18 11:52 [Bug c++/40486] New: " dragan at plusplus dot co dot yu
2009-06-18 11:57 ` [Bug c++/40486] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-06-18 13:11 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-06-18 13:14 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-06-18 14:19 ` dragan at plusplus dot co dot yu
2009-06-18 15:40 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-06-18 16:26 ` jason at redhat dot com
2009-06-18 17:09 ` dragan at plusplus dot co dot yu
2009-06-19 12:05 ` dragan at plusplus dot co dot yu
2009-06-23 18:40 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com [this message]
2009-06-30 12:11 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-08-01  9:44 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090623184014.28154.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).