From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9773 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2009 12:05:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9718 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jun 2009 12:05:17 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090624120517.9717.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/36834] structure return ABI for windows targets differs from native MSVC In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg01763.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-24 12:05 ------- As I read this. Would it make sense to use for x86-mingw the callabi feature (as we do for the x64 variant)? This would be useful for 32-bit based multilib version, too (but this is more a side-note for this). Kai -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834