From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27035 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2009 15:40:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 26934 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2009 15:40:17 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090702154017.26933.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20165] Pointer does not really escape with write In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 15:40 ------- Dan, you mentioned a "pointer_no_escape" attribute. What was that about? I've never seen that mentioned before (or a patch to implement it). Sounds like a cool attribute to have (and not just for Fortran, too). -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot | |org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu | |dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20165