From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16610 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 06:45:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 16310 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2009 06:44:55 -0000 Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090707064455.16309.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/40657] allocate local variables with fewer instructions In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "carrot at google dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00491.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from carrot at google dot com 2009-07-07 06:44 ------- Could we do the optimization in function thumb1_expand_prologue? If we find this opportunity in function thumb1_expand_prologue, we can remove the sp manipulations from prologue and epilogue. We also should add extra registers to push/pop operands. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40657