From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 549 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 12:47:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 425 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2009 12:47:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090707124706.424.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/40551] Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 12:47 ------- > You were right - contiguous does need initializing. Not for this case but > some of the other uses that I referred to. Paul, what is the plan? You had a 4.4 and 4.5 check in, contiguous is not initialized in 4.5. Do you want to fix that? Or can this PR be closed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40551