From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25134 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 16:48:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 24849 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2009 16:48:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090707164819.24848.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug regression/40667] Performance regression: stack frames are generated even with -fomit-frame-pointer In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2009-07-07 16:48 ------- "Why do you limit your stack boundary artificially?" Because if I don't use FP code there is no point in aligning the stack. Aligning the stack wastes stack space and code size and doesn't improve performance of integer code in any way. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667