public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/39024]  New: static libelf needs to be built PIC
@ 2009-01-29 16:50 ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-07-09  5:07 ` [Bug bootstrap/39024] " bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-29 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

I had built the prerequisite libelf 0.8.10 for lto statically to avoid RPATH
issues, but noticed that by default liblto_plugin.so.0 failed to link since
libelf.a contained non-PIC code.  Building with -fPIC fixed this, but the
requirement better be documented.


-- 
           Summary: static libelf needs to be built PIC
           Product: gcc
           Version: lto
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
  GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39024


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/39024] static libelf needs to be built PIC
  2009-01-29 16:50 [Bug bootstrap/39024] New: static libelf needs to be built PIC ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-09  5:07 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-09  5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-07-09 05:07:07
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39024


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/39024] static libelf needs to be built PIC
       [not found] <bug-39024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-07-18 16:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-18 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39024

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-18 16:54:01 UTC ---
Given that mainline doesn't use libelf any longer, there's no point in fixing
or
documenting this.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-18 16:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-29 16:50 [Bug bootstrap/39024] New: static libelf needs to be built PIC ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-09  5:07 ` [Bug bootstrap/39024] " bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-39024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-07-18 16:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).