From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31647 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2009 19:03:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 27902 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jul 2009 19:02:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090710190243.27895.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/40643] maxloc/minloc: Wrong result for NaN at position 1 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00893.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 19:02 ------- Created an attachment (id=18175) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18175&action=view) Results for the testcase with ifort, sunf95, NAG f95, openf95, g95 > Is this the behavior we want? Good question. See attachment for the results of other compilers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40643