From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2384 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2009 09:24:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 2261 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2009 09:23:49 -0000 Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090711092349.2260.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/40668] 64-bit sparc miscompiles memcpy of argument inside switch In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00920.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 09:23 ------- Subject: Bug 40668 Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 11 09:23:32 2009 New Revision: 149511 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149511 Log: PR target/40668 * function.c (assign_parm_setup_stack): Adjust MEM_OFFSET (data->stack_parm) if promoted_mode is different from nominal_mode on big endian. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr40668.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr40668.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/function.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668