From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8667 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2009 18:00:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 8623 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jul 2009 18:00:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090713180017.8622.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/40734] ICE on attempt to compile trivial Fortran program In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg01043.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-13 18:00 ------- Fortran reports are never anything but "normal". However, would you really expect that a compiler would be released that can't handle code like the one quoted? I find it hard to believe, especially on a platform as common as i686-pc-linux-gnu. Does the C-compiler work? Something like ... $> cat hello.c #include int main() { printf("hello\n"); return 0; } $> gcc hello.c && ./a.out If not, I'd check configuration, compilation and installation. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Severity|blocker |normal GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40734