public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/39722]  New: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and mn10300
@ 2009-04-10 12:51 bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-04-14  8:30 ` [Bug target/39722] [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-04-10 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

struct S
{
  unsigned int s;
};
struct T
{
  struct S t[2];
  unsigned int u : 1;
};

void
foo (int x, int y, int z)
{
  int i;
  struct T t;

  t.u = t.u;
  for (i = 0; i < x; i++)
    if (z != 1)
      t.t[i].s = y || t.u;
}


-- 
           Summary: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and
                    mn10300
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: bonzini at gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 39714
             nThis:


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39722] [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr
  2009-04-10 12:51 [Bug target/39722] New: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and mn10300 bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-14  8:30 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-05-12 12:07 ` [Bug target/39722] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] " bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-04-14  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-04-14 08:29 -------
Seems to be caused by a failure to simplify

    (if_then_else (ne (zero_extract:SI (const_int 0 [0x0])
                (const_int 1 [0x1])
                (const_int 0 [0x0]))
            (const_int 0 [0x0]))
        (label_ref 71)
        (pc)))


-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[cond-optab] worse code with|[cond-optab] worse code with
                   |bitfields on v850 and       |bitfields on v850, mn10300,
                   |mn10300                     |avr


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39722] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr
  2009-04-10 12:51 [Bug target/39722] New: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and mn10300 bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-04-14  8:30 ` [Bug target/39722] [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-12 12:07 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-07-14 21:18 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-05-12 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P4
            Summary|[cond-optab] worse code with|[4.5 Regression][cond-optab]
                   |bitfields on v850, mn10300, |worse code with bitfields on
                   |avr                         |v850, mn10300, avr
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39722] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr
  2009-04-10 12:51 [Bug target/39722] New: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and mn10300 bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-04-14  8:30 ` [Bug target/39722] [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-05-12 12:07 ` [Bug target/39722] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] " bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-14 21:18 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
  2010-04-06 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-31  9:32 ` [Bug target/39722] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-07-14 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-07-14 21:17 -------
(This is gcc.c-torture/compile/20071128-1.c).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39722] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr
  2009-04-10 12:51 [Bug target/39722] New: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and mn10300 bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-07-14 21:18 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-06 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-31  9:32 ` [Bug target/39722] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-06 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 -------
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.5.0                       |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39722] [4.5/4.6 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr
  2009-04-10 12:51 [Bug target/39722] New: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and mn10300 bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-04-06 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-31  9:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-31  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-31 09:29 -------
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.5.1                       |4.5.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-31  9:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-10 12:51 [Bug target/39722] New: [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850 and mn10300 bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-04-14  8:30 ` [Bug target/39722] [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-05-12 12:07 ` [Bug target/39722] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] " bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-07-14 21:18 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2010-04-06 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-31  9:32 ` [Bug target/39722] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).