From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-288877-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16815 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2009 10:09:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 16705 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jul 2009 10:09:19 -0000
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20090715100919.16703.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-40762-12544@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c/40762] possible integer miscompilation
In-Reply-To: <bug-40762-12544@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg01258.txt.bz2



------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 10:09 -------
Confirmed.  With -O2 -fno-inline we get in .optimized

func_36 ()
{
<bb 2>:
  g_10 = 1;
  func_53 ();
  g_64 = 1;
  return 1;

FRE does this.  I'll check.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-07-15 10:09:19
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40762