public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090718112607.16422.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-39055-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-18 11:26 -------
GCC's history with this code is:
* GCC 2.95.3 rejects
* GCC 3.0 - 3.2.3 accepts
* GCC 3.3 - 3.3.6 rejects
* GCC 3.4.0 - 4.3.x crashes
* GCC 4.4.0 - trunk accepts
Without the template, only GCC 2.93.3 rejects the code, all other
versions accept it. Considering that also Intel and Comeau accept
the code (template and non-template version) I doubt that the code
is invalid.
Jason, you said:
> I was wrong; the previous paragraph says "Local variables shall not
> be used in default argument expressions."
> 3.3 was right to reject the testcase;
IMHO "Local variables" refers to function local variables, so that
you were right in the first place (comment #3) and that the code is
indeed valid.
This would mean that we really can close the bug as fixed in GCC 4.4.0.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Known to work|3.2.3 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-18 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-01 10:16 [Bug c++/39055] New: [4.2/4.3/4.4 " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-01 10:16 ` [Bug c++/39055] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-01 10:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-06 2:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-12 23:23 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2009-02-20 5:38 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-22 14:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 21:09 ` [Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-18 11:26 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-07-18 11:38 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-12 22:48 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-13 16:16 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:29 ` [Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-07 15:52 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090718112607.16422.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).