From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22195 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2009 23:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 22010 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2009 23:00:08 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090723230008.22007.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/40597] Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg01934.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #35 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-07-23 23:00 ------- Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:52:01PM -0000, paolo dot bonzini at gmail dot com wrote: > > > ------- Comment #34 from paolo dot bonzini at gmail dot com 2009-07-23 22:52 ------- > Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes > in expmed.c > > On 07/23/2009 02:37 PM, krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > In emit_store_flag the following code now invokes emit_store_flag_1 instead of > > emit_store_flag: > > This one in particular should be a recursive call indeed. Can you > prepare a patch? > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40597 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. Just to be sure we are on the same page, is the trunk up to date, or are there patches to the trunk that haven't been committed yet. It looks like the patch was committed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40597