From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24852 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 08:06:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 24414 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 08:06:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090729080600.24413.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Function object abstraction penalty with inline functions. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg02312.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-07-29 08:05 ------- Subject: Re: Function object abstraction penalty with inline functions. On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-28 19:38 ------- > One step at a time, Dave ;) Indeed ;) Just adding a CCP pass is likely not going to happen here. Moving / adding FRE to early optimizations might get done though. Dependent on time available for evaluation ... Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40874