From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25864 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 08:09:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 25798 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 08:08:53 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090729080853.25797.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Function object abstraction penalty with inline functions. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg02313.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-07-29 08:08 ------- Subject: Re: Function object abstraction penalty with inline functions. > I'll take this for now. My preferred way of fixing this would be to include FRE pass. Unfortunately my last benchmarks adding FRE early wasn't showing much of win on our benchmark suite... Still it seems right thing to do. Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40874