From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20953 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2009 13:10:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 20824 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2009 13:09:57 -0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090731130957.20823.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg02540.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #23 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-07-31 13:09 ------- Subject: Re: -related issues (C99 issues) On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > Note, in C++1x, those macros should be effectively predefined *only* when > is included, not when is included. Thus, I agree - note That's not how I read N2914; it appears to say is a strict superset of . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448