* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
@ 2009-08-02 8:48 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2009-08-02 9:33 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dcb314 at hotmail dot com @ 2009-08-02 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-08-02 08:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=18284)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18284&action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2009-08-02 8:48 ` [Bug c++/40938] " dcb314 at hotmail dot com
@ 2009-08-02 9:33 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-08-02 9:45 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-08-02 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-02 09:33 -------
PR40866 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2009-08-02 8:48 ` [Bug c++/40938] " dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2009-08-02 9:33 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2009-08-02 9:45 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2009-08-02 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dcb314 at hotmail dot com @ 2009-08-02 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-08-02 09:44 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> PR40866 ?
Maybe - there are many ways to fail a sanity check.
I notice that the line where it crashes is of the form
gcc_assert(!X && Y);
It might be better to split this into two gcc_assert statements,
so the user would be better informed which X or Y is wrong.
gcc_assert( !X);
gcc_assert( Y);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-02 9:45 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
@ 2009-08-02 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-02 11:36 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-02 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 09:47 -------
No, the asserts are enabled in release builds, so they should be combined to
reduce executable size.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-02 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-02 11:36 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-08-02 11:45 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-08-02 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-02 11:36 -------
Still, you can certainly help the project by temporarily splitting the two
checks in your local tree, rebuilding, and telling us if both PRs fail on the
same one or not...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-02 11:36 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2009-08-02 11:45 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-11-15 17:44 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-08-02 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-02 11:45 -------
Or alternately playing a bit with the debugger, of course ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-02 11:45 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2009-11-15 17:44 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-11-15 19:20 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2009-11-15 19:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-11-15 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-15 17:44 -------
Works for me now (r154190). If you can still see something wrong, please
reopen.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-15 17:44 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2009-11-15 19:20 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2009-11-15 19:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dcb314 at hotmail dot com @ 2009-11-15 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-11-15 19:19 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Works for me now (r154190).
I have no idea what r154190 means, but I can confirm
that the snapshot of 2009112 seems to work ok,
even at optimisation level -O3 -march=native.
This looks fixed to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/40938] ice in create_tmp_var
2009-08-02 8:46 [Bug c++/40938] New: ice in create_tmp_var dcb314 at hotmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-15 19:20 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
@ 2009-11-15 19:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-11-15 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-15 19:56 -------
r154190 is the subversion version I built and tested, this project doesn't use
cvs anymore.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread