From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9426 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2009 13:07:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 9387 invoked by uid 48); 2 Aug 2009 13:06:50 -0000 Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090802130650.9386.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/40941] gfc_typespec: put derived, cl and interface into union In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "janus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 13:06 ------- Note: I'm not sure if 'interface' can go into the union too. This might be problematic if we have a PROCEDURE with an interface whose return value is CHARACTER or TYPE. (?) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40941