* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-05 4:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-05 17:02 ` dpatel at apple dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-05 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 04:59 -------
I think there is a patch on Apple's branch but from what I heard is that it
causes huge compile time issues.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-05 4:59 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-05 17:02 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2005-10-31 2:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2005-10-05 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from dpatel at apple dot com 2005-10-05 17:02 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++
compiler
AFAIK, It is not about compile time issue. There is another patch
available which is better than what is in apple branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-05 4:59 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-05 17:02 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2005-10-31 2:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-06 22:23 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " dpatel at apple dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 02:29 -------
Devant says in Comment #3 that there's a better patch; where is it?
Leaving as P2, as, sadly STABS is still used on some important targets.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-31 2:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-06 22:23 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2006-02-24 0:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2005-12-06 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dpatel at apple dot com 2005-12-06 22:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=10430)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10430&action=view)
zem's patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-06 22:23 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2006-02-24 0:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25 2:33 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-24 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25 -------
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-24 0:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-25 2:33 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-22 9:39 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-25 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:32 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-25 2:33 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-22 9:39 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-03 8:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-22 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 09:39 -------
Is this really such a big deal? Solaris uses DWARF, and so does Apple now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-22 9:39 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-03 8:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:13 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-03 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 08:37 -------
> Is this really such a big deal? Solaris uses DWARF, and so does Apple now.
Sure, as far as Solaris is concerned, end of the story. But other platforms
are stuck with STABS (Tru64, HP-UX). And it seems that we even have a patch.
In the
end, I guess it's entirely Mark's call.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-03 8:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-19 20:42 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:13 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-11-19 20:42 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-04 22:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-19 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 20:42 -------
Perhaps this could be solved now by using the information
provided by mapped locations... this is akin to the "replay"
idea Eric mentions in the linked-to email.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-11-19 20:42 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-01-04 22:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 9:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-04 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 22:04 -------
I took a look at the attached patch.
I don't like it much. I think it puts the work in the wrong place --
libcpp and the lexer -- when, IMO, the problem should be addressed
by changing dbxout.c (and perhaps the debug API).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-01-04 22:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-01-06 9:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-16 22:50 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-06 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 08:07 -------
> I don't like it much. I think it puts the work in the wrong place --
> libcpp and the lexer -- when, IMO, the problem should be addressed
> by changing dbxout.c (and perhaps the debug API).
I'm afraid that changing dbxout.c is out of the question at this point. Maybe
we should simply concede defeat and close this as WONTFIX.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2008-01-06 9:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-01-16 22:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 16:49 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-16 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 22:39 -------
Sure, but I still see hpux11.11 in the list of secondary platforms. OTOH, if
nobody is going to invest the time to fix this we can as well close this issue.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]|[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]
|DBX_USE_BINCL support broken|DBX_USE_BINCL support broken
|in the C++ compiler |in the C++ compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2008-01-16 22:50 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 16:49 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-04 0:28 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 16:48 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|DBX_USE_BINCL support broken|DBX_USE_BINCL support broken
|in the C++ compiler |in the C++ compiler
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 16:49 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-04 0:28 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
2009-03-31 16:45 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2008-12-04 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-12-04 00:27 -------
I noticed the reference to hppa in comment #13 of this bug report. hppa uses
stabs but does not define DBX_USE_BINCL so is probably not affected by this
bug. If hppa is the only reason not to close it we can probably go ahead and
close it.
Looking at the GCC sources I see DBX_USE_BINCL defined in config/darwin.h,
config/dbxcoff.h, and config/dbxelf.h.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at cup dot hp dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-04 0:28 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
@ 2009-03-31 16:45 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-11 5:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 16:44 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|DBX_USE_BINCL support broken|DBX_USE_BINCL support broken
|in the C++ compiler |in the C++ compiler
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 16:45 ` [Bug debug/19523] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-11 5:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/19523] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
[not found] <bug-19523-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-11 5:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-11 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 05:44 -------
As per comment #15.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread