public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-31 4:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:02 -------
The patch in Comment #1 has been applied.
Andrew, what is your point about the C++ front-end? What is it you think is
wrong?
In any case, this will never be release critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-31 4:02 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 4:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 3:21 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:13 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Andrew, what is your point about the C++ front-end? What is it you think is
> wrong?
There is no mention of the C++ front-end here at all.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-31 4:02 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-11 3:21 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-18 11:43 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 3:21 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-18 11:43 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-21 21:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-18 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:43 -------
nnot release critical for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-18 11:43 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-21 21:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-21 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-21 21:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:57 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 19:57 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-06 15:46 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:57 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|missing uninitialization |missing uninitialization
|warning |warning
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] missing uninitialization warning
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 19:57 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-06 15:46 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 18:50 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions) jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-06 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 15:46 -------
Still fails in GCC 4.4. My understanding is that this code in fold_builtin_n
if (ret)
{
ret = build1 (NOP_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (ret), ret);
=> TREE_NO_WARNING (ret) = 1;
return ret;
}
creates a NOP(s), where the NOP tree is marked nowarning. Then, at some moment
later, the nowarning is copied to the tree corresponding to s. In my opinion,
this is the bug: the nowarning bit should not pass to s.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO| |24639
nThis| |
Last reconfirmed|2006-02-01 04:33:56 |2009-02-06 15:46:39
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions)
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-06 15:46 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 18:50 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:27 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 18:50 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|missing uninitialized |missing uninitialized
|warning (builtin functions) |warning (builtin functions)
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions)
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 18:50 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions) jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:27 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions)
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-22 18:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-22297-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-31 4:02 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 3:21 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-18 11:43 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-21 21:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:57 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-06 15:46 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 18:50 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions) jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:27 ` [Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).