public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
@ 2006-09-24 23:04 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-25 15:05 ` [Bug target/29206] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 more replies)
0 siblings, 19 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2006-09-24 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/387875 ]
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/388505 ]
gcj-dbtool segfaults on hppa-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnu; arm doesn't have
libjava support yet; the patches available from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2006-08/msg00123.html were used.
rechecked both with a new 4.2 as a debian package and a vanilla
upstream build. the installed gcj-dbtool crashes. I don't see the
segfault, when gcj-dbtool is called during the build.
GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "hppa-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/libthread_db.so\
.1".
(gdb) set args -n
(gdb) run
Starting program: /scratch/packages/gcc/4.2/tstinstall/bin/gcj-dbtool -n
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 16384 (LWP 17786)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 17786)]
GC_push_all_eager (bottom=<value optimized out>,
top=0xc0345d48
"�4]HB�\003@B���O��")
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/mark.c:1468
1468 q = *p;
(gdb) p p
$1 = (word *) 0xbfb45000
(gdb) p *p
Cannot access memory at address 0xbfb45000
(gdb) bt
#0 GC_push_all_eager (bottom=<value optimized out>,
top=0xc0345d48
"�4]HB�\003@B���O��")
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/mark.c:1468
#1 0x4214f74c in GC_push_all_stacks ()
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/pthread_stop_world.c:307
#2 0x42147d58 in GC_push_roots (all=16384, cold_gc_frame=0xc0345b48
"B��@")
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/mark_rts.c:646
#3 0x42147438 in GC_mark_some (cold_gc_frame=0xc0345d48
"�4]HB�\003@B���O��")
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/mark.c:326
#4 0x4213d5cc in GC_stopped_mark (stop_func=0x4000)
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/alloc.c:531
#5 0x4213d9c4 in GC_try_to_collect_inner (stop_func=0x4000)
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/alloc.c:378
#6 0x42149718 in GC_init_inner () at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/misc.c:789
#7 0x421499e4 in GC_init () at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/misc.c:493
#8 0x42142f94 in GC_init_gcj_malloc (mp_index=-1078702080, mp=0xc0345d48)
at ../../../gcc-20060910/boehm-gc/gcj_mlc.c:60
#9 0x4146df2c in _Jv_InitGC () at ../../../gcc-20060910/libjava/boehm.cc:503
#10 0x41414664 in _Jv_CreateJavaVM (vm_args=0x0)
at ../../../gcc-20060910/libjava/prims.cc:1434
#11 0x41414e48 in _Jv_RunMain (vm_args=0x4000, klass=0x26770,
name=0xc0345b48 "B��@", argc=2, argv=0xc034540c,
is_jar=false)
at ../../../gcc-20060910/libjava/prims.cc:1520
#12 0x414151c8 in _Jv_RunMain (klass=0xc0345d48,
name=0xb <Address 0xb out of bounds>, argc=1119747456,
argv=<value optimized out>, is_jar=false)
at ../../../gcc-20060910/libjava/prims.cc:1593
#13 0x414151f4 in JvRunMain (klass=0xbfb45000, argc=1, argv=0x42bdfd80)
at ../../../gcc-20060910/libjava/prims.cc:1599
#14 0x42f14338 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#15 0x00012610 in _start () at ../sysdeps/hppa/elf/start.S:84
--
Summary: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
GCC target triplet: hppa-linux-gnu arm-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2006-09-25 15:05 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-28 19:30 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-25 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 15:04 -------
Either show that it is a regression, or dont put the regression marker in the
subject.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool |gcj-dbtool segfaults
|segfaults |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-25 15:05 ` [Bug target/29206] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-28 19:30 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-28 19:31 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2006-09-28 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-09-28 19:30 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Either show that it is a regression, or dont put the regression marker in the
> subject.
rechecked, that it is a regression on hppa-linux-gnu, compared to 4.1.2 SVN.
Matthias
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |4.2.0
Known to work| |4.1.2
Summary|gcj-dbtool segfaults |[4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool
| |segfaults
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-25 15:05 ` [Bug target/29206] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-28 19:30 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2006-09-28 19:31 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-28 20:53 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2006-09-28 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-09-28 19:31 -------
attached the stacktrace for arm-linux-gnu
Matthias
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/doko/gcc/4.2/install/usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.2 -n foo.db
64
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 16384 (LWP 18291)]
[New Thread 32769 (LWP 20685)]
[New Thread 16386 (LWP 20790)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 18291)]
0x41bf6434 in _Unwind_GetIPInfo () from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
(gdb) bt
#0 0x41bf6434 in _Unwind_GetIPInfo () from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
#1 0x40b988c0 in _Jv_StackTrace::UnwindTraceFn (context=0xbfffebcc,
state_ptr=<value optimized out>)
at ../../../src/libjava/stacktrace.cc:141
#2 0x41bf6a04 in _Unwind_Backtrace () from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
#3 0x40b987cc in _Jv_StackTrace::GetStackTrace () at
../../../src/libjava/stacktrace.cc:170
#4 0x40bd9bd0 in java::lang::VMThrowable::fillInStackTrace () at
../../../src/libjava/java/lang/natVMThrowable.cc:33
#5 0x40f9aee4 in java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace()java.lang.Throwable
(this=0xbfffebcc)
at ../../../src/libjava/classpath/java/lang/Throwable.java:498
#6 0x40f9a8d4 in java.lang.Throwable.Throwable(java.lang.String)
(this=0x41ef2220, message=0x41f6ed98)
at ../../../src/libjava/classpath/java/lang/Throwable.java:159
#7 0x40f846d8 in java.lang.Exception.Exception(java.lang.String)
(this=0xbfffebcc, s=0xbfffebac)
at ../../../src/libjava/classpath/java/lang/Exception.java:77
#8 0x40f8219c in
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException.ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.String)
(this=0xbfffebcc, s=0xbfffebac)
at ../../../src/libjava/classpath/java/lang/ClassNotFoundException.java:83
#9 0x40fc7870 in
java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(java.lang.String)java.lang.Class
(this=0x41edb2d8, className=0x41f0fb90)
at ../../../src/libjava/java/net/URLClassLoader.java:1080
#10 0x40bfdb48 in
gnu.gcj.runtime.BootClassLoader.bootLoadClass(java.lang.String)java.lang.Class
(this=0xbfffebcc, name=0x41f0fb90)
at ../../../src/libjava/gnu/gcj/runtime/BootClassLoader.java:55
#11 0x40bd9788 in java::lang::VMClassLoader::loadClass (name=0x41f0fb90,
resolve=0 '\0')
at ../../../src/libjava/java/lang/natVMClassLoader.cc:208
#12 0x40bd2d90 in _Jv_FindClass (name=0x41f0d730, loader=0x0) at
../../../src/libjava/java/lang/natClassLoader.cc:407
#13 0x40bd1a40 in java::lang::Class::forName (className=0x41f6ee88,
initialize=1 '\001', loader=0x0)
at ../../../src/libjava/java/lang/natClass.cc:88
#14 0x40bf8f90 in
gnu.gcj.convert.BytesToUnicode.getDecoder(java.lang.String)gnu.gcj.convert.BytesToUnicode
(encoding=0x41edcaf0)
at ../../../src/libjava/gnu/gcj/convert/BytesToUnicode.java:101
#15 0x40bd7a40 in java::lang::String::init (this=0x3, bytes=0x41efad30,
offset=0, count=2, encoding=0x41edcaf0)
at ../../../src/libjava/java/lang/natString.cc:490
#16 0x40f91210 in java.lang.String.String(byte[], int, int) (this=0x41f6eeb8,
data=0x41efad30, offset=0, count=2)
at ../../../src/libjava/java/lang/String.java:345
#17 0x40b83f24 in JvConvertArgv (argc=3, argv=0xa398) at
../../../src/libjava/prims.cc:953
#18 0x40b84e58 in _Jv_RunMain (vm_args=0x0, klass=0x16460, name=0x0, argc=4,
argv=0xbffffa64, is_jar=false)
at ../../../src/libjava/prims.cc:1537
#19 0x40b85190 in _Jv_RunMain (klass=0xbfffebac,
name=0x41714e90
"(d���Ah\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@h\036���@"...,
argc=1085821328, argv=<value optimized out>,
is_jar=false) at ../../../src/libjava/prims.cc:1597
#20 0x40b851bc in JvRunMain (klass=0xbfffebcc, argc=1097944720, argv=0x0) at
../../../src/libjava/prims.cc:1603
#21 0x41c14e44 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#22 0x41c14e44 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
Previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pb at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-28 19:31 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2006-09-28 20:53 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-10-08 11:05 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2006-09-28 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-09-28 20:53 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
> Starting program: /home/doko/gcc/4.2/install/usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.2 -n foo.db
> 64
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> [New Thread 16384 (LWP 18291)]
> [New Thread 32769 (LWP 20685)]
> [New Thread 16386 (LWP 20790)]
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 18291)]
> 0x41bf6434 in _Unwind_GetIPInfo () from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x41bf6434 in _Unwind_GetIPInfo () from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
The following patch introduced _Unwind_GetIPInfo:
2006-02-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR other/26208
...
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-28 20:53 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2006-10-08 11:05 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-10-24 8:15 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2006-10-08 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-10-08 11:05 -------
rechecked with explicitely disabling the use of _Unwind_GetIPInfo (undefine
HAVE_GETIPINFO):
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool -n foo.db 64
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 16384 (LWP 19080)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 19080)]
GC_push_all_eager (bottom=<value optimized out>, top=0xc0473c88
"�G<\210B�\233@B�\204\234O��")
at ../../../src/boehm-gc/mark.c:1468
1468 ../../../src/boehm-gc/mark.c: No such file or directory.
in ../../../src/boehm-gc/mark.c
(gdb) bt
#0 GC_push_all_eager (bottom=<value optimized out>, top=0xc0473c88
"�G<\210B�\233@B�\204\234O��")
at ../../../src/boehm-gc/mark.c:1468
#1 0x42119be4 in GC_push_all_stacks () at
../../../src/boehm-gc/pthread_stop_world.c:307
#2 0x42119be4 in GC_push_all_stacks () at
../../../src/boehm-gc/pthread_stop_world.c:307
Previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-08 11:05 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2006-10-24 8:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-06 19:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-24 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-24 8:15 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-06 19:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-06 21:09 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: drow at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-06 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 19:33 -------
Created an attachment (id=12553)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12553&action=view)
Potential patch.
This hasn't been tested yet; when it has I can add a changelog and post it.
That's in progress now.
Ranjit's patch to enable prologue analysis on i386 changed the behavior for
other SJLJ targets. They used to call the no-op fallback_backtrace from
sysdep/generic/backtrace.h; afterwards they called _Unwind_Backtrace. This
links for SJLJ, but does not work, and when the trace function is called for
_URC_END_OF_STACK, _Unwind_GetIP segfaults.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-06 19:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-06 21:09 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-11-06 21:48 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2006-11-06 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-06 21:09 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
> Ranjit's patch to enable prologue analysis on i386 changed the behavior for
> other SJLJ targets. They used to call the no-op fallback_backtrace from
> sysdep/generic/backtrace.h; afterwards they called _Unwind_Backtrace. This
> links for SJLJ, but does not work, and when the trace function is called for
> _URC_END_OF_STACK, _Unwind_GetIP segfaults.
>From the PR, I had no idea that debian was still using the SJLJ exception
support on this target. I switched to only building and testing with DWARF2
exceptions a long time ago.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-06 21:09 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2006-11-06 21:48 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-06 22:14 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: drow at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-06 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 21:47 -------
I'm not sure, but I think that our hppa port hasn't switched over yet.
As for ARM, I'm not sure what to do to fix the issue. ARM old ABI is stuck
with SJLJ. And the EABI can't implement _Unwind_Backtrace either. I have been
speaking with someone at ARM about the ABI implications of this, on and off,
but I don't have a lot of hope for it working out without a GNU extension.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-06 21:48 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-06 22:14 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2007-02-19 20:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2006-11-06 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-11-06 22:14 -------
hppa is supposed to use dwarf2 based exceptions in Debian; at least that's what
the libgcc soversion (4) suggests; explicitely configuring with
--enable-sjlj-exceptions would configure tu build libgcc with soversion 3.
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-06 22:14 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2007-02-19 20:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-14 21:32 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-19 20:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-14 21:32 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-14 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2007-05-14 21:32 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 16:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-09 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 19:22 -------
Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.2
Target Milestone|4.2.2 |4.2.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-01 16:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:35 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-01 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 -------
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.3 |4.2.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-01 16:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-19 20:35 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 19:44 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-19 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 20:22 -------
4.2.4 is being released, changing milestones to 4.2.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.4 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-19 20:35 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 19:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 19:44 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-03-31 19:44:28
date| |
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 regression]
|gcj-dbtool segfaults |gcj-dbtool segfaults
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 19:44 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-26 12:29 ` dl9pf at gmx dot de
2010-05-22 18:17 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-26 12:29 ` dl9pf at gmx dot de
2010-05-22 18:17 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: dl9pf at gmx dot de @ 2009-10-26 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from dl9pf at gmx dot de 2009-10-26 12:29 -------
Confirmed also for 4.4.1 on arm-linux-gnueabi.
--
dl9pf at gmx dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dl9pf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-26 12:29 ` dl9pf at gmx dot de
@ 2010-05-22 18:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-22 18:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-24 23:04 [Bug target/29206] New: [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-25 15:05 ` [Bug target/29206] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-28 19:30 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-28 19:31 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-09-28 20:53 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-10-08 11:05 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-10-24 8:15 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-06 19:34 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-06 21:09 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-11-06 21:48 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-06 22:14 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2007-02-19 20:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-14 21:32 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 16:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:35 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 19:44 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-26 12:29 ` dl9pf at gmx dot de
2010-05-22 18:17 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).