From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9057 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2009 13:42:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 8935 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2009 13:42:19 -0000 Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090805134219.8934.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/13979] Error message about no matching function for call with derived class arguments could be improved In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jason at redhat dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00533.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from jason at redhat dot com 2009-08-05 13:42 ------- Subject: Re: Error message about no matching function for call with derived class arguments could be improved On 08/04/2009 06:42 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > I don't even know if we have different codepaths for those! We do: if there's a conversion that seems likely but invalid, we build it up but set bad_p on it so that we can give a more helpful diagnostic when we try to use it. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13979