From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10205 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2009 09:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10146 invoked by uid 48); 8 Aug 2009 09:07:04 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090808090704.10145.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/41004] missed merge of basic blocks In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00786.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-08 09:07 ------- Why does the basic block reordering pass also not handle this? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-08-08 09:07:04 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41004