From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-291005-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22821 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2009 16:06:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 20031 invoked by uid 48); 8 Aug 2009 16:05:57 -0000
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20090808160557.20030.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-19165-6458@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug other/19165] (Natural) language independent error / warning classification
In-Reply-To: <bug-19165-6458@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00807.txt.bz2



------- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-08 16:05 -------
Created an attachment (id=18329)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18329&action=view)
XML diagnostics

A prototype of XML mode for diagnostics. The output looks like:

<diagnostic class="error"
location="/home/manuel/src/test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/array-2.c:10:8">
inicializaci&#65533;n de un miembro de matriz flexible en un contexto anidado
</diagnostic>

<diagnostic class="error"
location="/home/manuel/src/test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/array-2.c:10:8">
(cerca de la inicializaci&#65533;n de 'g2.f.x')
</diagnostic>

<diagnostic class="warning"
location="/home/manuel/src/test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/array-2.c:13:8">
exceso de elementos en el inicializador de matriz
</diagnostic>

<diagnostic class="warning"
location="/home/manuel/src/test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/array-2.c:13:8">
(cerca de la inicializaci&#65533;n de 'h1.x')
</diagnostic>

I am not planning to work on this further. This patch shows that it can be
done, but I don't know if there is any interest on this.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165