From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1596 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2009 11:18:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 1560 invoked by uid 48); 10 Aug 2009 11:18:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090810111831.1559.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/41023] Inconsistent error locations for wrong interfaces with overloaded operators In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "domob at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00890.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 11:18 ------- The same holds for type-bound operators, see for instance gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_2.f03 for the current "inconsistent" locations. But as the checking code is mainly shared, a fix will probably do both in one. I think though that this should be verified (e.g. by adapting the mentioned test-case to the new error locations which will be necessary anyways). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41023