public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
@ 2009-08-09 16:26 sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-09 16:28 ` [Bug target/41015] " sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp @ 2009-08-09 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
glibc-2.10.1 is not correctly compiled with gcc-4.4.1 for sh4-linux.
I attached preproccessed code.
Reproduce: sh4-linux-gcc -O2 -fPIC -S strtod_l.i
Wrong part is as follows.
.L453:
mov #64,r13
tst r9,r9 !!
add r14,r13
mov.l @(4,r13),r0
#APP
! 1306 "strtod_l.c" 1
mov r11,r5 !! udiv_qrnnd macro
swap.w r7,r4
swap.w r5,r6
jsr @r10 ! call __udiv_qrnnd_16
shll16 r6
swap.w r4,r4
jsr @r10 ! call __udiv_qrnnd_16
swap.w r1,r8
or r1,r8
! 0 "" 2
#NO_APP
bf/s .L323
mov.l r0,@(4,r13)
In this code, "tst r9,r9" is moved to wrong place as if
"t" bit is not clobbered in __udiv_qrnnd_16.
I guessed that missing "t" bit constraint in udiv_qrnnd macro
caused this problem. So I tried following patch, but there was
no effect.
Index: gcc/longlong.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/longlong.h (revision 150591)
+++ gcc/longlong.h (working copy)
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@
" or r1,%0" \
: "=r" (q), "=&z" (r) \
: "1" (n1), "r" (n0), "rm" (d), "r" (&__udiv_qrnnd_16) \
- : "r1", "r2", "r4", "r5", "r6", "pr"); \
+ : "r1", "r2", "r4", "r5", "r6", "pr", "t"); \
} while (0)
#define UDIV_TIME 80
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/41015] [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
@ 2009-08-09 16:28 ` sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-09 22:44 ` [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 " kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp @ 2009-08-09 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp 2009-08-09 16:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=18330)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18330&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-09 16:28 ` [Bug target/41015] " sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
@ 2009-08-09 22:44 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-10 4:47 ` sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-09 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-09 22:44 -------
I've confirmed that 4.5 has the same problem and 4.3 doesn't.
> In this code, "tst r9,r9" is moved to wrong place as if
> "t" bit is not clobbered in __udiv_qrnnd_16.
>
> I guessed that missing "t" bit constraint in udiv_qrnnd macro
> caused this problem. So I tried following patch, but there was
> no effect.
I think you are right. Also your patch solves the problem in my
tests. Did you make strtod_l.i change as your patch does for
longlong.h?
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Known to fail| |4.4.1 4.5.0
Known to work| |4.3.4
Priority|P3 |P4
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-08-09 22:44:43
date| |
Summary|[4.4 Regression] SH: |[4.4/4.5 Regression] SH:
|miscompilation for sh4-linux|miscompilation for sh4-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-09 16:28 ` [Bug target/41015] " sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-09 22:44 ` [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 " kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-10 4:47 ` sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-10 5:08 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp @ 2009-08-10 4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp 2009-08-10 04:47 -------
I found that there is a copy of longlong.h in glibc/stdlib.
After fixing it, it worked.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-10 4:47 ` sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
@ 2009-08-10 5:08 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-10 20:58 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-10 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 05:08 -------
Ah, I see. Could you please send that patch to libc list?
I'll fix gcc/longlong.h on gcc trunk and 4.4 branch after
the usual tests.
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet| |sh*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-10 5:08 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-10 20:58 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-11 22:37 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-11 22:38 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-10 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 20:57 -------
Subject: Bug 41015
Author: kkojima
Date: Mon Aug 10 20:57:35 2009
New Revision: 150635
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150635
Log:
PR target/41015
* longlong.h [__sh__] (udiv_qrnnd): Add T register to clobber list.
(sub_ddmmss): Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/longlong.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-10 20:58 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-11 22:37 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-11 22:38 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-11 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-11 22:37 -------
Subject: Bug 41015
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue Aug 11 22:36:56 2009
New Revision: 150667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150667
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2009-08-10 SUGIOKA Toshinobu <sugioka@itonet.co.jp>
PR target/41015
* longlong.h [__sh__] (udiv_qrnnd): Add T register to clobber list.
(sub_ddmmss): Likewise.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/longlong.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-11 22:37 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-11 22:38 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-11 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-11 22:38 -------
Fixed.
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41015
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-11 22:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-09 16:26 [Bug target/41015] New: [4.4 Regression] SH: miscompilation for sh4-linux sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-09 16:28 ` [Bug target/41015] " sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-09 22:44 ` [Bug target/41015] [4.4/4.5 " kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-10 4:47 ` sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
2009-08-10 5:08 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-10 20:58 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-11 22:37 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-11 22:38 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).