From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14915 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2009 11:31:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 14876 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2009 11:31:34 -0000 Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090816113134.14875.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/39959] [4.5 Regression] IMA is broken In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg01330.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-08-16 11:31 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] IMA is broken On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-16 00:16 ------- > (In reply to comment #7) > > It was fixed between revision revision 150368 and revision 150371. > > For the record, "covered up" rather than "fixed" according to > . > > Richi, the "I have a patch" comment, is that stale or still in the pipe? Well, it's stale. It broke too much. The idea was to fix it up during gimplification which we should be able to do now. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39959