From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10069 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 11:28:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 10027 invoked by uid 48); 18 Aug 2009 11:28:45 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090818112845.10026.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mahatma at eu dot by" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg01491.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #27 from mahatma at eu dot by 2009-08-18 11:28 ------- (In reply to comment #26) > *** Bug 40985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #25) > Created an attachment (id=18393) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18393&action=view) [edit] > A patch for gcc 4.4 Are this patch may conflict with your patch? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18340&action=view - equal to 32893 solution. I found, once you are broke (make regression) 4.4 branch against 32893 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32893#c23 - I found there are your, sorry). May be this is way to suggest more correct sse solution vs. local bugfix for 32893, but while I not understand all - I trying to use both patches. May it be wrong? PS One more sorry, but I want to know ALL ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838